Friday, August 31, 2007

A princess and a saint


Princess Diana died ten years ago today in a tragic car accident while fleeing from the constant hounding, hounding, incessant hounding of photographers. She died at the age of 36. Who can forget the dreadful images of the Mercedes Benz twisted and wrecked in the Paris tunnel on Pont de l'Alma road? Even as the princess lay dying in the back seat of the car, the paparazzi kept their cameras flashing. I consider them responsible for her death.

The 10th anniversary of that unnecessary tragedy has been marked with extravagant tributes from around the world to the memory of the princess. During Princess Diana’s short life she gave her formidable support to numerous charities and worthy causes.

On September 5th 1997, Mother Teresa died at the age of 87, after a lifetime of work with the poorest of the poor in India. Her death was overshadowed by that of Princess Diana, five days earlier. CNN anchor Martin Savage reported Mother Teresa’s death as a secondary story to the evening's broadcast. Savage said she was a missionary to the “so-called poorest of the poor.” I was furious. "So-called" poorest of the poor!

I fired off a fax to CNN challenging Savage. Who did he -- with his expensive suit and blow-dried hair -- consider to be the world's poorest of the poor? To the credit of Mr. Savage, he immediately called me at my house and apologized, saying he was simply reading what was on the teleprompter. Hmmm.

The nasty, anti-Christian writer, Christopher Hitchens, however, has called Mother Teresa a “mediocre human personality.” He said, “She was a fanatic, a fundamentalist, and a fraud”.[1] Martin may be called Mr. Savage but this odious man is truly Mr. Vicious. Hitchens occasionally appears on CNN and other television networks to spew his vitriol around the globe.

Jesus’ standard for greatness was obviously different than Hitchens’. Christ said, “The greatest among you must be your servant.” (Matthew 23.11, also see Matthew 21.25-27.) That's what Mother Teresa was.

Mother Teresa epitomized what Christ meant when He prayed, “I gave them your word, and the world hated them, because they do not belong to the world any more than I belong to the world.” (John 17.14)

Now on the 10th anniversary of Mother Teresa’s death a new book about her spiritual darkness and doubts is about to hit bookshelves.[2]
It will be curious to see what sort of tributes will trickle across the newscasts of western secular media for the greatest woman of God in the past 100 years. (I’m referring to Mother Teresa not Princess Diana.)
A Princess and a saint

A princess and a saint: One lived in extravagant luxury, the other lived in austerity. One reached out to those in need while the other lived with those in need and gave her life to them. One was the people’s princess while the other brought humanity’s poorest the divine love of the King of Kings.

The world was made poorer with the tragic and premature death of Princess Diana on August 31st 1997. The world was made richer by Mother Teresa’s life of Christian service and obedience to God, which came to its natural conclusion on September 5th 1997.

None of us know when our lives will end. Make your life a beautiful gift to God and humanity. Very few of us will ever be royalty but we can all serve the King.

Mark Pickup

“It is at the most humble works that is your place and mine ... Because there will be many people to do the big things, but very few will do the small ones." -- Mother Teresa

___________________________


[1] Christopher Hitchens, “Mommy Dearest: The Pope Beatifies Mother Teresa, A Fanatic, a Fundamentalist, and a Fraud”, Slate, October 20th 2003. (http://www.slate.com/id/2090083)
[2] Mother Teresa: Come Be My Light (Doubleday).

Thursday, August 23, 2007

My latest blog entry


To read my latest blog entry "The human journey" go to http://humanlifematters.blogspot.com
Mark

Thursday, August 16, 2007


To read my latest post "Opus Dei - a work of God" - go to http://humanlifematters.blogspot.com/
Mark

Friday, August 10, 2007

Why Rudy should not be President


The headline said “Rudy Giuliani Refuses to Discuss How His Catholic Faith Relates to Abortion.” According to LifeNews, GOP Presidential candidate Guiliani was asked to comment about the role his faith did or did not play in formulating his position favoring abortion. (See - http://www.lifenews.com/nat3262.html). He did not answer the question and declined to answer other questions regarding religion and abortion.

It’s understandable why RG would not engage in discussions about religion and abortion. He’s a Catholic and he supports abortion. His position is indefensible. Catholic teaching on the matter of abortion is unequivocal:

“Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception. From the first mement of his existence, a human being must be recognized as having the rights of a person – among which is the inviolable right of every innocent being to life.” (Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC), No. 2270)

“Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable.” (CCC, 2271)

The Church doesn’t mince words, there is no such thing as pro-choice Catholics. I have addressed this point in earlier blogs (see “Orthodoxy versus Apostasy” July 24th 2007).

It insufficient for Rudy Giuliani (or any other Catholic politician) to claim to be Catholic when it suits their purposes but not adhere to the teachings of the Church when it offends their personal preferences, fashionable thinking, or the left-leaning media which is dominantly pro-abortion.

Catholicism is not based upon personal preferences, or public opinion, rather revealed Objective truth. And objective truth (and yes, it really exists) is rarely fashionable. It makes people uncomfortable, and reminds them of shame. Objective truth calls men away from Sin and Evil. Objective truth draws people out of spiritual darkness and into its piercing light. Jesus Christ is the source of all truth—whether revealed or yet to be.

Here is an Objective truth: Abortion is wicked. It is murder of the weakest and most defenseless.

Any politician who defends abortion is unfit for public office. They do not support the first universal human right which is the right to life for all. And that right extends to every member of the Human Family from conception to natural death.

By his actions and positions, Rudy Giuliani tells us he believes in qualified or selective human rights, not universal human rights. His behavior defies the believe in Objective truths that are self-evident. He not only betrays a truth of Catholicism -- he betrays the “self-evident” truth America’s founders articulated by declaring “all men are created equal” and everyone has the “Right to life.”

Of course Rudy Giuliani avoids questions about religion and abortion! It cuts to the heart a moral poverty within him. His vision of the interdependent human family is deficient. Does that mean he should not be President? That's exactly what I'm saying. Unless his vision for America includes the care and protection of all members of the human family, he is not fit for the Presidency.

That's what I think.

Mark Pickup